People v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 6004, 153 A.D.3d 969, 56 N.Y.S.3d 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 3, 2017·No. 107893·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 3, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree and was sentenced, as a second violent felony offender, to a prison term of nine years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive when considering his difficult childhood and addiction to marihuana. We disagree. The sentence, which was well within the statutory range (see Penal Law §§ 70.02 [1] [b]; 70.04 [2], [3] [b]), was in accord with the plea agreement. Defendant engaged the help of his 17-year-old son, who was armed with a weapon, in the commission of the instant offense and has a lengthy criminal history. As such, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances to warrant a reduction of the agreed-upon sentence (see People v Kerwin, 117 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2014]; People v Sipe, 7 AD3d 827, 827 [2004]).

Lynch, J.P., Rose, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 6004, 153 A.D.3d 969, 56 N.Y.S.3d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6004 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sipe
7 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Kerwin
117 A.D.3d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)