People v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 3024, 149 A.D.3d 986, 50 N.Y.S.3d 305
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 2017·No. 2014-05285·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered April 30, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal trespass in the second degree, and petit larceny, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Johnson, 51 NY2d 986, 987-988 [1980]; People v Pazmini, 132 AD3d 1015 [2015]; People v Petitbrun, 123 AD3d 1057, 1058 [2014]; People v Butler, 17 AD3d 379, 380 [2005]). In any event, the record does not support the defendant’s contention that the waiver was invalid. The defendant executed a written waiver in open court after allocution by the court, the trial justice approved the waiver, and the circumstances surrounding the waiver supported the Supreme Court’s determination that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Pazmini, 132 AD3d at 1015; People v Silva, 91 AD3d 675, 675 [2012]; People v Fani, 59 AD3d 460 [2009]).

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court misapprehended its discretion by not sentencing him to parole supervision is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 410.91; People v Eggsware, 90 AD3d 1231, 1234 n 2 [2011]; People v Rivers, 63 AD3d 423 [2009]). The defendant’s further contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is not reviewable on direct appeal because it involves matter dehors the record (see People v Love, 57 NY2d 998, 1000 [1982]; People v Rivers, 63 AD3d at 423).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 3024, 149 A.D.3d 986, 50 N.Y.S.3d 305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3024 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. White
2025 NY Slip Op 03359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Vazquez
164 N.Y.S.3d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Baez
202 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Black
2021 NY Slip Op 06183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Jerrick
2020 NY Slip Op 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Dibble
2019 NY Slip Op 7165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Chernyaev
2019 NY Slip Op 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Perez
2018 NY Slip Op 8960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Maldonado
2018 NY Slip Op 8959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Young
2018 NY Slip Op 8159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Socci
2018 NY Slip Op 2664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Johnson
2018 NY Slip Op 308 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Schlackman
2017 NY Slip Op 6090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Tucker
2017 NY Slip Op 5249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)