People v. Williams

55 A.D.3d 708, 864 N.Y.S.2d 781
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the [709]*709defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), dated June 20, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed points for both the age of the victim and the incapacity of the victim is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Awalt, 17 AD3d 336 [2005]; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482 [2004]; People v Baker, 303 AD2d 570 [2003]). In any event, the contention is without merit (see People v Stevens, 48 AD3d 536 [2008]; People v Davenport, 38 AD3d 634 [2007]; People v Vaughn, 26 AD3d 776 [2006]). The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for a downward departure. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 55 A.D.3d 708, 864 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 708 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Morrison
2017 NY Slip Op 8867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Benitez
140 A.D.3d 1140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)