People v. Williams

303 A.D.2d 427, 755 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2099
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 272 A.D.2d 986

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[428]*428fendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered March 2, 2001, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon his admission that he violated a condition thereof and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of assault in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 4H NY2d 606 [1979]). Altman, J.P., Smith, Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 303 A.D.2d 427, 755 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

303 A.D.2d 427 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)