People v. Williams
297 A.D.2d 829, 748 N.Y.2d 64, 748 N.Y.S.2d 64, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8954
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to fully cross-examine a prosecution witness. The defendant failed to show that “relevant and important facts bearing on the trustworthiness of crucial testimony” were kept from the jury (cf. People v Ashner, 190 AD2d 238, 247). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to give the defendant the opportunity to recall the witness for further cross-examination. Altman, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Williams, 297 A.D.2d 829, 748 N.Y.2d 64, 748 N.Y.S.2d 64, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Nathaniel S.
7 A.D.3d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)