People v. Williams

288 A.D.2d 878, 733 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 661

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [5]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, he was not denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s comments during summation, particularly where, as here, County Court issued curative instructions and thereby alleviated any prejudice arising from those comments (see, People v Curley, 159 AD2d 969, 970, Iv denied 76 NY2d 733; People v Plant, 138 AD2d 968, Iv denied 71 NY2d 1031). Defendant failed to preserve his remaining contention for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Geraci, Jr., J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Scudder, Burns, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 288 A.D.2d 878, 733 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Plant
138 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Curley
159 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)