People v. Williams

255 A.D.2d 1014, 679 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 721

Opinion

—Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is “reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Chautauqua County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in this application is premature (see, People v Scott, 197 AD2d 936; see also, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 AD2d 1043). Present— Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 255 A.D.2d 1014, 679 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 1014 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Jacobsen
170 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Scott
197 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)