People v. Williams

234 A.D.2d 405, 651 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D.2d 445

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.), rendered August, 19, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the showup identification of the defendant was done in close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime and was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 544; People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 234 A.D.2d 405, 651 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 405 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hicks
500 N.E.2d 861 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)