People v. Williams

201 A.D.2d 967, 610 N.Y.S.2d 911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D.2d 629

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The record at the reconstruction hearing ordered by this Court (see, People v Williams, 189 AD2d 340, appeal dismissed sub nom. People v Walker, 81 NY2d 1065) establishes that defendant did not have the opportunity for "meaningful participation” to which he was entitled (People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254, 268). Furthermore, we conclude that defendant’s presence at the conference would not have been "superfluous” (People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872, 874; see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.— Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 201 A.D.2d 967, 610 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 967 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Odiat
631 N.E.2d 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Favor
624 N.E.2d 631 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Walker
81 N.Y.2d 1065 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Dokes
595 N.E.2d 836 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Williams
189 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)