People v. Williams

159 A.D.2d 228, 552 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.2d 525

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J., at suppression hearing; Ira Beal, J., at jury trial and sentence), convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from AVz to 9 years, is unanimously affirmed.

We find no merit to defendant’s claim that the proof of the uncharged sales deprived him of a fair trial (People v Hernandez, 71 NY2d 233). While the better practice would have been for the court to give limiting instructions explaining the purpose of such proof, here the unpreserved error was harmless (People v Williams, 67 AD2d 265, 268, affd 50 NY2d 996). Also unpreserved is defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s comments on summation concerning the uncharged crimes were improper; were we to reach this argument, we would find it to be of no merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 159 A.D.2d 228, 552 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 228 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
409 N.E.2d 949 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Alvino
519 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Williams
67 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)