People v. Williams

131 A.D.2d 617, 516 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48086
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered August 31, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

[618]*618Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There was a sufficient degree of resemblance between the defendant and the other individuals who sat in the lineup with him to dispel any claim of undue suggestiveness (see, People v Accoo, 126 AD2d 730; People v Gairy, 116 AD2d 733, lv denied 67 NY2d 942; People v Scott, 114 AD2d 915, lv denied 67 NY2d 765). Thus, the hearing court properly determined that the complainant’s lineup and in-court identifications of the defendant were admissible. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 131 A.D.2d 617, 516 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

131 A.D.2d 617 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thompson
143 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)