People v. Wigfall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wigfall

207 A.D.2d 973, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10158

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 973 (People v. Wigfall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wigfall, 207 A.D.2d 973, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203), is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of attempted arson in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 150.20). We further conclude that the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. Finally, defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Attempted Arson, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203), is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of attempted arson in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 150.20). We further conclude that the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. Finally, defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Attempted Arson, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 973, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wigfall-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack