People v. Wigfall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wigfall

198 A.D.2d 675, 605 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10754

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 675 (People v. Wigfall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wigfall, 198 A.D.2d 675, 605 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered July 1, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

We reject defendant’s claim that his negotiated prison sentence of six years to life is unduly harsh or excessive. The sentence was within statutory guidelines and defendant received a substantial benefit by pleading as he did in satisfaction of two multicount indictments. Defendant has not pre[676]*676sented circumstances extraordinary enough to justify disturbing his sentence.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered July 1, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

We reject defendant’s claim that his negotiated prison sentence of six years to life is unduly harsh or excessive. The sentence was within statutory guidelines and defendant received a substantial benefit by pleading as he did in satisfaction of two multicount indictments. Defendant has not pre[676]*676sented circumstances extraordinary enough to justify disturbing his sentence.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 675, 605 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wigfall-nyappdiv-1993.