People v. Wheeler

49 A.D.3d 1230, 852 N.Y.2d 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 2008·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1231]*1231Memorandum: In each appeal, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [former (4)]). Although defendant is correct that the sentence imposed in each appeal does not correspond to County Court’s sentencing commitment, we conclude that the error was ministerial, “it being clear from the plea minutes that the court inadvertently transposed the sentences it intended to impose” (People v Rodriguez, 216 AD2d 40, 41 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 874 [1995]). We therefore modify the judgment in each appeal accordingly. Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Lunn, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wheeler, 49 A.D.3d 1230, 852 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 1230 (People v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wheeler
49 A.D.3d 1231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)