People v. West

California Court of Appeal

People v. West

194 Cal. App. 2d 772, 15 Cal. Rptr. 204, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 1878

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 16, 1961

DocketCrim. No. 3170

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 Cal. App. 2d 772 (People v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. West, 194 Cal. App. 2d 772, 15 Cal. Rptr. 204, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 1878 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN DYKE, P. J.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict which found appellant guilty of a sale of heroin in violation of section 11501 of the Health and Safety Code and from an order denying a new trial.

Upon appellant’s request for counsel this court appointed Alfred B. McKenzie, Esquire, to represent him. Mr. Mc[773]*773Kenzie advised the court that he has concluded that the appeal is wholly without merit. After an independent review of the record we have reached the same conclusion.

Although appellant denied his guilt, an informer testified that appellant made the sale of the heroin which was introduced in evidence. The jury was fully and correctly instructed and there were no errors of law.

The judgment and the order are affirmed.

Peek, J., and Warne, J., pro tem.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN DYKE, P. J.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict which found appellant guilty of a sale of heroin in violation of section 11501 of the Health and Safety Code and from an order denying a new trial.

Upon appellant’s request for counsel this court appointed Alfred B. McKenzie, Esquire, to represent him. Mr. Mc[773]*773Kenzie advised the court that he has concluded that the appeal is wholly without merit. After an independent review of the record we have reached the same conclusion.

Although appellant denied his guilt, an informer testified that appellant made the sale of the heroin which was introduced in evidence. The jury was fully and correctly instructed and there were no errors of law.

The judgment and the order are affirmed.

Peek, J., and Warne, J., pro tem.,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Cal. App. 2d 772, 15 Cal. Rptr. 204, 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 1878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-west-calctapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack