People v. Wells

135 A.D.3d 976, 22 N.Y.S.3d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 2016·No. 2014-06370·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), imposed June 4, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

When the Supreme Court explained the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal to him, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137 [2014]; People v Bond, 109 AD3d 481 [2013]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wells, 135 A.D.3d 976, 22 N.Y.S.3d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 976 (People v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
2019 NY Slip Op 6795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Ortiz
2018 NY Slip Op 8330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Quinones
2018 NY Slip Op 6038 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Ortizcora
2018 NY Slip Op 5495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Resnick
2018 NY Slip Op 1486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Diaz
2017 NY Slip Op 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Mack
142 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Flores
139 A.D.3d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)