People v. Resnick

2018 NY Slip Op 1486
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 2018
Docket2016-11558
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1486 (People v. Resnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Resnick, 2018 NY Slip Op 1486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Resnick (2018 NY Slip Op 01486)
People v Resnick
2018 NY Slip Op 01486
Decided on March 7, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 7, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
L. PRISCILLA HALL
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2016-11558
(Ind. No. 922/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Michael Resnick, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ronald Hollie, J.), imposed September 30, 2016, as amended October 4, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.

When the Supreme Court explained the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal to him, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by a plea of guilty. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and, therefore, unenforceable (see People v Wells, 135 AD3d 976, 976). The sentence, however, was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, HALL, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wells
135 A.D.3d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-resnick-nyappdiv-2018.