People v. Weeks
This text of 272 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although a constitutional speedy trial claim is not waived by a guilty plea (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 282), defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds only (see, CPL 30.30) and thus failed to preserve for our review his present contention that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, People v Lieberman, 47 NY2d 931, 932; People v James, 188 AD2d 296). In any event, “review of the constitutional issue is precluded by the lack of an adequate record which it was defendant’s burden to provide” (People v James, supra; see, People v Larry, 178 AD2d 282, 283, Iv denied 79 NY2d 1003). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Wisner and Hurl-butt, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 983, 708 N.Y.S.2d 687, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weeks-nyappdiv-2000.