People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robinson

301 A.D.2d 371, 752 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 301 A.D.2d 371 (People v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Robinson, 301 A.D.2d 371, 752 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J.), rendered October 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s guilt was clearly established by his written confession along with his fingerprints placing him at the scene. Defendant’s acquittal of the burglary charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557), and his argument in this regard calls for speculation as to the jury’s thought processes. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J.), rendered October 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s guilt was clearly established by his written confession along with his fingerprints placing him at the scene. Defendant’s acquittal of the burglary charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557), and his argument in this regard calls for speculation as to the jury’s thought processes. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 371, 752 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack