People v. Way

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Way

437 P.2d 535, 165 Colo. 161, 1968 Colo. LEXIS 768

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedFebruary 26, 1968

Docket23039

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 437 P.2d 535 (People v. Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Way, 437 P.2d 535, 165 Colo. 161, 1968 Colo. LEXIS 768 (Colo. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

Mr. Chief Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Theodore Way was charged with robbery and conspiring to commit robbery. Trial was to a jury which found him not guilty of robbery but found him guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and/or for New Trial was filed by counsel for Way, and after a hearing thereon the trial court sustained the motion and ordered that the defendant be discharged from custody. The trial court found that the only evidence offered tending to establish the crime of conspiracy was the evidence tending to prove that Way was an active participant in the robbery which was the subject matter of the count upon which he was found not guilty.

On writ of error it is urged by the people that the trial court erred in granting the motion. It is argued that we should reverse the judgment of acquittal and remand the case back to the district court with directions to enter judgment on the verdict and to impose an appropriate sentence. No appearance has been made by or on behalf of Way.

The decision of the trial court was made in reliance on our holding in Robles v. People, 160 Colo. 297, 417 P.2d 232, in which this court said, inter alia:

“In the case before us, it is true that the People established the commission of the Welcome Inn robbery by two gunmen. The extrajudicial statements of the defendant, if voluntary, therefore constituted sufficient [163]*163evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty of robbery if such a verdict had been found. However, the jury, based on the evidence before it, found that the defendant was not guilty of the robbery. The very same evidence which the jury apparently did not believe was sufficient to prove the defendant participated in the robbery was the only evidence which could prove him guilty of conspiracy. Under such circumstances, the conspiracy verdict cannot stand.”

The above quoted language is in all respects applicable to the instant case and the court did not err in granting the motion. If counsel for the people insist upon submitting to the jury a count of conspiracy as well as a count of robbery where the evidence which would convict upon either charge is exactly the same, the jury should be instructed that it cannot convict on one count and acquit on the other.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice McWilliams and Mr. Justice Kelley specially concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Theodore Way was charged with robbery and conspiring to commit robbery. Trial was to a jury which found him not guilty of robbery but found him guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and/or for New Trial was filed by counsel for Way, and after a hearing thereon the trial court sustained the motion and ordered that the defendant be discharged from custody. The trial court found that the only evidence offered tending to establish the crime of conspiracy was the evidence tending to prove that Way was an active participant in the robbery which was the subject matter of the count upon which he was found not guilty.

On writ of error it is urged by the people that the trial court erred in granting the motion. It is argued that we should reverse the judgment of acquittal and remand the case back to the district court with directions to enter judgment on the verdict and to impose an appropriate sentence. No appearance has been made by or on behalf of Way.

The decision of the trial court was made in reliance on our holding in Robles v. People, 160 Colo. 297, 417 P.2d 232, in which this court said, inter alia:

“In the case before us, it is true that the People established the commission of the Welcome Inn robbery by two gunmen. The extrajudicial statements of the defendant, if voluntary, therefore constituted sufficient [163]*163evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty of robbery if such a verdict had been found. However, the jury, based on the evidence before it, found that the defendant was not guilty of the robbery. The very same evidence which the jury apparently did not believe was sufficient to prove the defendant participated in the robbery was the only evidence which could prove him guilty of conspiracy. Under such circumstances, the conspiracy verdict cannot stand.”

The above quoted language is in all respects applicable to the instant case and the court did not err in granting the motion. If counsel for the people insist upon submitting to the jury a count of conspiracy as well as a count of robbery where the evidence which would convict upon either charge is exactly the same, the jury should be instructed that it cannot convict on one count and acquit on the other.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice McWilliams and Mr. Justice Kelley specially concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

437 P.2d 535, 165 Colo. 161, 1968 Colo. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-way-colo-1968.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack