People v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Watson

19 Cal. App. 333

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 26, 1912

DocketCrim. No. 246

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cal. App. 333 (People v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Watson, 19 Cal. App. 333 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

JAMES, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement and sentenced to serve a term of two years’ imprisonment in the state prison. He appealed to this court from that judgment, and from an order made denying his motion for a new trial. The record on appeal, consisting of the reporter’s and clerk’s transcripts, was filed in this court on the twenty-sixth day of February, 1912, and thereafter upon stipulation of counsel time was twice extended within which defendant might file a brief in support of his appeal. No brief was filed within the time allowed, and on June 24th this cause was ordered to be submitted. Appellant having failed to support his appeal, either by oral argument or printed brief, the judgment and order must be affirmed. (Pen. Code, sec. 1253; People v. Albitre, 153 Cal. 367, [95 Pac. 653].)

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JAMES, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement and sentenced to serve a term of two years’ imprisonment in the state prison. He appealed to this court from that judgment, and from an order made denying his motion for a new trial. The record on appeal, consisting of the reporter’s and clerk’s transcripts, was filed in this court on the twenty-sixth day of February, 1912, and thereafter upon stipulation of counsel time was twice extended within which defendant might file a brief in support of his appeal. No brief was filed within the time allowed, and on June 24th this cause was ordered to be submitted. Appellant having failed to support his appeal, either by oral argument or printed brief, the judgment and order must be affirmed. (Pen. Code, sec. 1253; People v. Albitre, 153 Cal. 367, [95 Pac. 653].)

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cal. App. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watson-calctapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack