People v. Albitre

95 P. 653, 153 Cal. 367, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 468
California Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1908·No. Crim. No. 1411·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree, and adjudged to suffer death. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. No brief having been filed in support of the appeal, the matter was submitted by the attorney-general upon the transcript, without oral argument, there being no appearance for defendant. The failure of defendant to file a brief or to appear' on oral argument constitutes under our law sufficient reason for affirming the judgment and order. (Pen. Code, see. 1253.) We have, however, carefully examined the record. The evidence contained therein amply warranted the verdict, and there is nothing to indicate that any substantial error was committed in the proceedings of the trial court.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Albitre, 95 P. 653, 153 Cal. 367, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 468 (Cal. 1908).

95 P. 653 (People v. Albitre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Guerin
152 P. 747 (Montana Supreme Court, 1915)
People v. Measor
128 P. 1016 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
People v. Watson
126 P. 177 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)