People v. Washington

183 N.Y.S.3d 861, 2023 NY Slip Op 01537
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2023
DocketInd. No. 70328/21
StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.Y.S.3d 861 (People v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Washington, 183 N.Y.S.3d 861, 2023 NY Slip Op 01537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Washington (2023 NY Slip Op 01537)
People v Washington
2023 NY Slip Op 01537
Decided on March 22, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 22, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-00681
(Ind. No. 70328/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kenneth Washington, appellant.


Samuel S. Cole, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Craig Stephen Brown, J.), rendered January 13, 2022, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court failed to adequately address his pro se speedy trial motion is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]), and we decline to reach the contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Stevens, 203 AD3d 958).

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, ZAYAS and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Stevens
203 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 N.Y.S.3d 861, 2023 NY Slip Op 01537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-washington-nyappdiv-2023.