People v. Washington

42 A.D.2d 677, 344 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4288
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 1, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 677 (People v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Washington, 42 A.D.2d 677, 344 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The District Attorney appeals from an order of County Court which severed and dismissed as to respondent an indictment charging respondent and his brother jointly with violations of subdivision 3 of sections 120.05 and 205.30 of the Penal Law on July 2,1971. The charges arose out of an altercation with police officers. The respondent was originally charged with these two felonies in informations filed in the Utica City Court. After a preliminary hearing on July 15, 1971, City Court dismissed the charges against respondent. The District Attorney then submitted the case to the Grand Jury which returned this indictment against respondent on October 13,1971. Various pretrial motions and discussions followed and on November 6, 1972 respondent moved for the first time to dismiss the indictment because the District Attorney had not afforded him an opportunity to testify before the Grand Jury. County Court granted the motion. The District Attorney had no obligation to notify respondent of the pending or prospective Grand Jury proceedings involving him because at the time of the Grand Jury proceeding there remained no currently undisposed of felony complaint pending against respondent in a local criminal court which was the subject of the Grand Jury investigation. (CPL 190.50 subd. 5, par. [a]), Furthermore, any right respondent had to dismissal of this indict[678]*678ment on the ground that his right to testify was violated was waived by his failure to move against this indictment within five days after his arraignment on the charges (CPL 190.50 subd. 5, par. [e]). (Appeal from order of Oneida County Court, dismissing indictment.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Cardamone, Simons and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Linder
2019 NY Slip Op 1965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Seneca Insurance
184 Misc. 2d 591 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Conde
131 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Ali
130 Misc. 2d 1013 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Reddy
108 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Lane
101 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Hooker
113 Misc. 2d 159 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
People v. Piccoli
62 A.D.2d 1078 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. LaBoy
87 Misc. 2d 449 (New York County Courts, 1976)
People v. Lunney
84 Misc. 2d 1090 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
People v. Otello
48 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A.D.2d 677, 344 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-washington-nyappdiv-1973.