People v. Conde
This text of 131 A.D.2d 586 (People v. Conde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), dated October 6, 1986, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment based upon the People’s failure to notify the defendant of his right to testify before the Grand Jury.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.
Contrary to the court’s conclusion, since the defendant had been held for the action of the Grand Jury and since he was, therefore, no longer the subject of an undisposed of felony complaint in a local criminal court, the District Attorney was under no affirmative obligation to notify the defendant of prospective or pending Grand Jury proceedings (see, People v Green, 110 AD2d 1035; People v Washington, 42 AD2d 677; People v Talham, 41 AD2d 354; People v Lunney, 84 Misc 2d 1090). Accordingly, it was error to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the notification requirements of CPL 190.50 (5) (a) were violated. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 A.D.2d 586, 516 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conde-nyappdiv-1987.