People v. Warren
This text of 73 Cal. App. 113 (People v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the crime of sex perversion as defined by section 288a of the Penal Code. He moved for a new trial and the motion was denied. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
The transcript was filed in this court February 11, 1925. No brief has been filed by appellant. The cause was placed on the calendar to be orally argued June 1, 1925. No appearance was made in behalf of appellant and the cause was ordered submitted on the record. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction and no error has beep discovered in the record.
The judgment and the order are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Cal. App. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-warren-calctapp-1925.