People v. Warner

74 N.W. 705, 116 Mich. 228, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 672
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 74 N.W. 705 (People v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Warner, 74 N.W. 705, 116 Mich. 228, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 672 (Mich. 1898).

Opinion

Hooker, J.

In 1853 there existed in Saginaw Bay an island called “Maisou,” which had never been surveyed. In that year a- survey of this island was made by the government, and it was sold in 1868. A copy of the plat which was made by the surveyor is attached to this opinion,1 whereby it is shown that the surveyor found land lying to the eastward of Maisou island, which, he denominated “Wet Marsh,” and apparently did not survey. It appears upon the plat as two small islands. These islands now constitute a part of a somewhat extensive stretch of land and shallows, known as the “Middle [230]*230Ground,” shown by a map filed herewith,1 and which is claimed by the State, but occupied by the defendant Warner, who is the admitted owner of Maisou island.

By Act No. 66, Pub. Acts 1891, the Middle Ground is made a public hunting and shooting ground. An effort was made by the State, in 1885, to induce the authorities at Washington to survey this Middle Ground, and issue a patent to the State, under the swamp-land act of 1850; and a survey of some sort was made by a federal surveyor, named Strudwick. The defendant Warner intervened, and made claim to the Middle Ground as an accretion to Maisou island; and, upon the other hand, the State claimed title to the newly-found land as accretions

[231]*231

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glass v. Goeckel
703 N.W.2d 58 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
Glass v. Goeckel
683 N.W.2d 719 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2004)
Peterman v. Department of Natural Resources
521 N.W.2d 499 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1994)
Bott v. Natural Resources Commission
327 N.W.2d 838 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1982)
Tennant v. Recreation Development Corp.
249 N.W.2d 348 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Cummings v. Boyles
411 S.W.2d 665 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1967)
Schweikart v. Stivala
45 N.W.2d 26 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1950)
Hilt v. Weber
233 N.W. 159 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)
Newman v. Bump
224 N.W. 321 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)
Kavanaugh v. Baird
217 N.W. 2 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Collins v. Gerhardt
211 N.W. 115 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
Payne v. Hall
192 Iowa 780 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1921)
Menominee River Lumber Co. v. Seidl
135 N.W. 854 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
Ainsworth v. Munoskong Hunting & Fishing Club
123 N.W. 802 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Stuart v. Greanyea
117 N.W. 655 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Robson v. Commissioner of State Land Office
111 N.W. 906 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1907)
Attorney General v. Herrick
76 N.E. 1045 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Webber v. Axtell
102 N.W. 915 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Nix v. Pfeifer
83 S.W. 951 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Olds v. Commissioner of State Land Office
134 Mich. 442 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 N.W. 705, 116 Mich. 228, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-warner-mich-1898.