Kavanaugh v. Baird

Michigan Supreme Court

Kavanaugh v. Baird

235 N.W. 871, 253 Mich. 631, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 970

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 3, 1928

DocketDocket No. 81, Calendar No. 33,104.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 N.W. 871 (Kavanaugh v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kavanaugh v. Baird, 235 N.W. 871, 253 Mich. 631, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 970 (Mich. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING. The opinion of the court in this case was handed down January 3, 1928, reported in 241 Mich. 240; but no decree was entered. Following the decision in Hilt v. Weber, 252 Mich. 198 (71 A.L.R. 1238), this court of its own motion ordered a rehearing herein. The facts and issues are so fully presented in the original opinion that there is no occasion for detailing them again. The decision as originally rendered in the KavanaughCase was overruled by the Hilt Case. In the orderly administration of justice this necessitates the court now holding that the plaintiff herein is entitled to a decree quieting the title in him to the relicted land involved as prayed in his bill of complaint. A decree may be taken accordingly, but without costs. *Page 633

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REHEARING. The opinion of the court in this case was handed down January 3, 1928, reported in 241 Mich. 240; but no decree was entered. Following the decision in Hilt v. Weber, 252 Mich. 198 (71 A.L.R. 1238), this court of its own motion ordered a rehearing herein. The facts and issues are so fully presented in the original opinion that there is no occasion for detailing them again. The decision as originally rendered in the KavanaughCase was overruled by the Hilt Case. In the orderly administration of justice this necessitates the court now holding that the plaintiff herein is entitled to a decree quieting the title in him to the relicted land involved as prayed in his bill of complaint. A decree may be taken accordingly, but without costs. *Page 633

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 N.W. 871, 253 Mich. 631, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kavanaugh-v-baird-mich-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack