People v. Warner

97 P.3d 811, 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 869
California Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2004·No. S126233·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

18 Cal.Rptr.3d 869 (2004)
97 P.3d 811

PEOPLE
v.
WARNER.

No. S126233.

Supreme Court of California.

September 15, 2004.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Does defendant's prior conviction of sexual assault of a child under Nebraska Revised Statutes, section 28-320.01 qualify as a serious felony for sentencing purposes in California although the Nebraska statute does not include all of the elements of any felony under California law amounting to a "lewd and lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 years" within the meaning of Penal Code section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(6)?

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Warner, 97 P.3d 811, 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 869 (Cal. 2004).

97 P.3d 811 (People v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lagunas v. State
187 S.W.3d 503 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
United States v. Gardinier
63 M.J. 531 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2006)
State v. Bobadilla
709 N.W.2d 243 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)
Adrian D. Lagunas v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
State v. Snowden
867 A.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2005)