People v. Ward

233 A.D.2d 899, 649 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s conviction is based on legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further conclude that Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender based on his two predicate felony convictions and his lengthy criminal record, which includes a number of violent offenses (see, CPL 400.20; Penal Law § 70.10 [1]; People v Treadwell, 206 AD2d 861, 862, lv denied 84 NY2d 1040; People v James, 194 AD2d 692, 693, lv denied 82 NY2d 720; People v Drummond, 104 AD2d 825).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and [900]*900conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ward, 233 A.D.2d 899, 649 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Portalatin v. Graham
478 F. Supp. 2d 385 (E.D. New York, 2007)