People v. Ward
225 A.D.2d 806, 639 N.Y.2d 959, 639 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ward. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D.2d 683 →
Opinion
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was ineffective (see, People v Patterson, 211 AD2d 829; People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Patterson, supra; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ward, 225 A.D.2d 806, 639 N.Y.2d 959, 639 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 806 (People v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Prescott
196 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Patterson
211 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)