People v. Walton

28 Mich. App. 608
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 1970·No. Docket No. 9846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The people move to affirm (GCR 1963, 817.5 [3]) defendant’s conviction, on plea of guilty, of larceny from a person, contrary to MCLA § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.589).

On appeal, defendant, a 20-year-old first offender at the time of this conviction, contends that the 7-1/2 to 10 year sentence imposed by the court violates the indeterminate sentence law, MCLA § 769.8 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1080).

This Court will not review a sentence which is within the maximum provided by statute, except in a clear case where the court has failed to exercise sound judicial discretion in setting a minimum sentence. People v. Lessard (1970), 22 Mich App 342. We find no abuse of discretion in this case. Certainly the sentence in this case, unlike the sentence in Lessard, permits the parole board to exercise its statutory discretion.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walton, 28 Mich. App. 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

28 Mich. App. 608 (People v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walton
184 N.W.2d 539 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)