People v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walsh

191 A.D.2d 473, 596 N.Y.S.2d 705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 A.D.2d 473 (People v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walsh, 191 A.D.2d 473, 596 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered October 24, 1989, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts), sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered October 24, 1989, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts), sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 473, 596 N.Y.S.2d 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack