People v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walsh

187 A.D.2d 687, 591 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walsh, 187 A.D.2d 687, 591 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from seven judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered January 11, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 6458/88, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment Nos. 6476/88, 6713/88, 6714/88, 51/89, 1711/89, and 1712/89 (one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Appellate review of the issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgments of conviction are affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from seven judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered January 11, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 6458/88, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment Nos. 6476/88, 6713/88, 6714/88, 51/89, 1711/89, and 1712/89 (one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Appellate review of the issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgments of conviction are affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 687, 591 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack