People v. Wallace

90 A.D.3d 958, 934 N.Y.2d 717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wallace. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 A.D.3d 1069

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403-404 [1995]; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel rests on matters dehors the record and may not be addressed on this appeal (see People v Romero, 82 AD3d 1013 [2011]; People v Kuar, 73 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2010]).

Inasmuch as the defendant received the sentence for which he bargained, he has no basis to now complain that it was excessive (see People v Cooper, 88 AD3d 1009, 1009 [2011]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wallace, 90 A.D.3d 958, 934 N.Y.2d 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 958 (People v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fiumefreddo
626 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Kuar
73 A.D.3d 1084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Romero
82 A.D.3d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Cooper
88 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)