People v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wallace

85 A.D.3d 1068, 925 N.Y.S.2d 851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.3d 1068 (People v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wallace, 85 A.D.3d 1068, 925 N.Y.S.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered September 9, 2008. The appeal was perfected on March 3, 2011, the respondent’s brief was filed on April 11, 2011, and the appeal was placed on this Court’s calendar for May 31, 2011. In the appellant’s brief, the appellant’s attorney informed the Court that the appellant was deported on or about April 21, 2010.

[1069]*1069Now, on the Court’s own motion, it is

Ordered that the appellant, or his attorney, are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has been deported and is no longer available to obey the mandate of this Court (see People v Hutchings, 40 NY2d 836 [1976]; People v Smith, 115 AD2d 625 [1985]; People v Davis, 87 AD2d 578 [1982]) by filing an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before July 21, 2011; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of this Court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60 (2), and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by regular mail; and it is farther,

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. Skelos, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered September 9, 2008. The appeal was perfected on March 3, 2011, the respondent’s brief was filed on April 11, 2011, and the appeal was placed on this Court’s calendar for May 31, 2011. In the appellant’s brief, the appellant’s attorney informed the Court that the appellant was deported on or about April 21, 2010.

[1069]*1069Now, on the Court’s own motion, it is

Ordered that the appellant, or his attorney, are directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant has been deported and is no longer available to obey the mandate of this Court (see People v Hutchings, 40 NY2d 836 [1976]; People v Smith, 115 AD2d 625 [1985]; People v Davis, 87 AD2d 578 [1982]) by filing an affidavit on that issue in the office of the Clerk of this Court on or before July 21, 2011; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of this Court, or his designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause upon the appellant at his last known place of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is confined by ordinary mail pursuant to CPL 470.60 (2), and upon the attorney who last appeared for him, and upon the District Attorney, by regular mail; and it is farther,

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. Skelos, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.3d 1068, 925 N.Y.S.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wallace-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack