People v. Wallace

9 A.D.3d 438, 780 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 19, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[439]*439Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered August 8, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The jury verdict finding the defendant guilty of assault in the first degree and acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is not repugnant. Viewing the verdict in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Green, 71 NY2d 1006, 1008 [1988]; People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1, 7 [1981]), the jury could have convicted the defendant of assault based upon his participation in the attack on the complainant under an acting-in-concert theory, yet acquitted him of criminal possession of a weapon because he did not physically possess or exercise dominion or control over the knife (see People v Olcan, 143 AD2d 369 [1988]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wallace, 9 A.D.3d 438, 780 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

9 A.D.3d 438 (People v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Barnette
2017 NY Slip Op 4131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)