People v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wallace

23 A.D.3d 920, 804 N.Y.S.2d 277

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.3d 920 (People v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wallace, 23 A.D.3d 920, 804 N.Y.S.2d 277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), rendered August 16, 2004 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with robbery in the first degree. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree in exchange for an agreed-upon sentence of five years in prison and waived his right to appeal all aspects of his case. Defendant was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement and now appeals.

Given defendant’s knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and comprehensive waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review his sole contention that the sentence should [921]*921be reduced in the interest of justice (see People v Clow, 10 AD3d 803, 804 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), rendered August 16, 2004 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with robbery in the first degree. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree in exchange for an agreed-upon sentence of five years in prison and waived his right to appeal all aspects of his case. Defendant was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement and now appeals.

Given defendant’s knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and comprehensive waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review his sole contention that the sentence should [921]*921be reduced in the interest of justice (see People v Clow, 10 AD3d 803, 804 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.3d 920, 804 N.Y.S.2d 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wallace-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack