People v. Walker

2 A.D.3d 656, 768 N.Y.S.2d 376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D.2d 660

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered June 29, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Ramos, 282 AD2d 622 [2001]; People v Sinclair, 266 AD2d 482 [1999]). A defendant is entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect one (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]). Mere losing tactics are not to be confused with ineffectiveness, and to sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, proof of less than meaningful representation is required, rather than disagreement with [657]*657counsel’s strategies and tactics (see People v Benevento, supra; People v Sinclair, supra, at 482).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 2 A.D.3d 656, 768 N.Y.S.2d 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 656 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Sinclair
266 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Ramos
282 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)