People v. Walker

269 A.D.2d 843, 703 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Walker, 269 A.D.2d 843, 703 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant “did not seek to reopen the [Huntley] hearing based on the trial testimony or move for a mistrial” (People v Kendrick, 256 AD2d 420, lv denied 93 NY2d 900) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement. We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ELAMIN, ROBERT, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Elamin
82 A.D.3d 1664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 843, 703 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walker-nyappdiv-2000.