People v. Walker

269 A.D.2d 843, 703 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant “did not seek to reopen the [Huntley] hearing based on the trial testimony or move for a mistrial” (People v Kendrick, 256 AD2d 420, lv denied 93 NY2d 900) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statement. We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 269 A.D.2d 843, 703 N.Y.S.2d 772, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ELAMIN, ROBERT, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Elamin
82 A.D.3d 1664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)