People v. Walker

243 A.D.2d 744, 665 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 607

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered October 4, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unauthorized use of motor vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly found that the defendant had failed to make the requisite prima facie showing that the People were using their peremptory challenges in an impermissibly discriminatory manner (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263). Thus, the court properly did not require the People to proffer race neutral reasons for the challenges (see, Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352; People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, supra).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal of the judgment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 243 A.D.2d 744, 665 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Childress
614 N.E.2d 709 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)