People v. Walker

192 A.D.2d 1101, 598 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that his second statement to the police should have been suppressed. Supreme Court properly found that any promise made by the police officers did not create a substantial risk that defendant might falsely incriminate himself (see, People v Giangrasso, 109 AD2d 750; People v Vail, 90 AD2d 917; People v Perry, 77 AD2d 269, 272-273; see also, People v Taber, 115 AD2d 126, lv denied 67 NY2d 657; see generally, CPL 60.45 [2] [b][i]).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 192 A.D.2d 1101, 598 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 1101 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jenkins
199 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)