People v. Walker

162 A.D.2d 969, 559 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9708
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D.2d 2

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]; § 20.00) and robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]; § 20.00; see, People v Bartlett, 115 AD2d 608, Iv denied 67 NY2d 880; People v Parker, 97 AD2d 943). From our review of the record, we also conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Green, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 162 A.D.2d 969, 559 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

162 A.D.2d 969 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Parker
97 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Bartlett
115 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)