People v. Walker

138 A.D.2d 939, 526 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.2d 948

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal, defendant asserts that oral and written inculpatory statements made to the police officers should have been suppressed and that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. Those claimed errors were not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we find no reason to exercise our discretion to reach them in the interest of justice (see, People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467, 471, 473; see also, People v Reed, 110 AD2d 1073). Were we to reach those issues, we would find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Aylward, J. —arson, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Walker, 138 A.D.2d 939, 526 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

138 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
407 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Reed
110 A.D.2d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)