People v. Walker

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Walker

180 N.W.2d 279, 24 Mich. App. 368, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1725

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 3, 1970

DocketDocket No. 8,816

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 N.W.2d 279 (People v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walker, 180 N.W.2d 279, 24 Mich. App. 368, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1725 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is submitted on the people’s motion to affirm. James Ray Walker pled guilty to a charge of assault with intent to commit rape, MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280). He appeals, contending that his guilty plea was accepted in violation of GCR 1963, 785.3 because his admissions of guilt were qualified and equivocal and indicated that he had no recollection of the crime.

[369]*369The nature of the defendant’s admissions must be judged in the context in which they were made. People v. Wilkins (1966), 3 Mich App 56. When this is done, it is clear that the defendant’s admissions of guilt are unqualified and unequivocal and that he does remember the crime.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is submitted on the people’s motion to affirm. James Ray Walker pled guilty to a charge of assault with intent to commit rape, MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280). He appeals, contending that his guilty plea was accepted in violation of GCR 1963, 785.3 because his admissions of guilt were qualified and equivocal and indicated that he had no recollection of the crime.

[369]*369The nature of the defendant’s admissions must be judged in the context in which they were made. People v. Wilkins (1966), 3 Mich App 56. When this is done, it is clear that the defendant’s admissions of guilt are unqualified and unequivocal and that he does remember the crime.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 N.W.2d 279, 24 Mich. App. 368, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walker-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack