People v. Walk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Walk

167 A.D.2d 927, 563 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14500

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 927 (People v. Walk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Walk, 167 A.D.2d 927, 563 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, defendant argues that there was no direct proof of guilt and that the circumstantial proof was legally insufficient. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203, rearg dismissed 48 NY2d 635) and giving the People the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence (People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111, 1112), we find that the circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient to form the basis for accomplice liability (cf., People v Burke, 126 AD2d 938). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, defendant argues that there was no direct proof of guilt and that the circumstantial proof was legally insufficient. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203, rearg dismissed 48 NY2d 635) and giving the People the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence (People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111, 1112), we find that the circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient to form the basis for accomplice liability (cf., People v Burke, 126 AD2d 938). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 927, 563 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-walk-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack