People v. Lewis

478 N.E.2d 198, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16945
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 478 N.E.2d 198 (People v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lewis, 478 N.E.2d 198, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16945 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The trial court, in its instructions, improperly removed from the jury’s consideration all of the elements of the crimes charged except for that of identification. This error, preserved for our review by defense counsel’s timely objection, his request for curative instructions and a motion made for a mistrial, deprived defendant of a fair trial, for “[n]o matter how conclusive the evidence * * * each of the * * * fundamental facts was for the jury to pass upon” (People v Walker, 198 NY 329,334; see also, People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 529). Although the admission by a defendant or his counsel of the existence of any of the elements of the crimes with which he was charged may have excused a court’s removal of these elements from the jury’s consideration (see, People v Walker, supra, p 335; People v Brady, 16 NY2d 186, 189-190) there was no such admission during the trial of this case.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jagdharry
118 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Whitten v. Martinez
24 A.D.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Rowland
14 A.D.3d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Baker
298 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Milhouse
246 A.D.2d 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Gordon
235 A.D.2d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Jamison
170 Misc. 2d 974 (Rochester City Court, 1996)
People v. Pierre
167 Misc. 2d 915 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
People v. Stone
225 A.D.2d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Wilcox
194 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Williams
190 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Flynn
79 N.Y.2d 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Jackson
585 N.E.2d 795 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Flynn
167 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Watkins
157 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Luperena
159 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Harrison
151 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. McGrew
150 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Rosevink
142 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Miller
123 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 N.E.2d 198, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lewis-ny-1985.