People v. Wadiak

105 A.D.3d 572, 962 N.Y.S.2d 902

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J), rendered September 29, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two years, with two years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender. A review of the Pennsylvania accusatory instrument establishes that his conviction in that state was for the equivalent of the New York felony of grand larceny in the fourth degree (see [573]*573People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586, 590-591 [1984]; People v Tyler, 4 AD3d 183 [1st Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 808 [2004]). The theft of over $2,000 is an essential element of defendant’s Pennsylvania felony, and his present argument to the contrary is unavailing.

We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Saxe, Román and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wadiak, 105 A.D.3d 572, 962 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

105 A.D.3d 572 (People v. Wadiak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzalez
463 N.E.2d 1210 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Tyler
4 A.D.3d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)