People v. Tyler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tyler

4 A.D.3d 183, 771 N.Y.S.2d 650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 183 (People v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tyler, 4 A.D.3d 183, 771 N.Y.S.2d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered December 11, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender. A review of defendant’s Pennsylvania accusatory instrument establishes that his conviction in that state was for the equivalent of a New York felony (see People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586, 590-591 [1984]). The language in that instrument relating to the value of an automobile identified the prong of the Pennsylvania statute under which defendant had been convicted, and was not surplusage. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered December 11, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender. A review of defendant’s Pennsylvania accusatory instrument establishes that his conviction in that state was for the equivalent of a New York felony (see People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586, 590-591 [1984]). The language in that instrument relating to the value of an automobile identified the prong of the Pennsylvania statute under which defendant had been convicted, and was not surplusage. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 183, 771 N.Y.S.2d 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tyler-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack